[PATCH 04/22] dosfs: Avoid MIN() re-definition
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Fri Nov 21 11:11:00 UTC 2014
On 21/11/14 11:26, Peter Dufault wrote:
> I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests before defining something because how do you know it was defined compatibly? Granted MIN is well-known so that's less likely than other uses of this pattern.
>
> Can the definition be made identical to the other definition to eliminate a warning or does GCC still warn about a redefinition?
I fixed it this way:
http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=11925eef789566a226d8eaacbceb4d89df787ebc
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list