[PATCH 50/52] cpukit/score/src/ts64*: Return a value from non-void function

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Wed Oct 8 20:22:27 UTC 2014


How did this stuff ever work, is it tested anywhere?
-Gedare

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> ---
>  cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c        | 2 +-
>  cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c | 2 +-
>  cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c     | 2 +-
>  cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c       | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c
> index 28c6fa4..fd07474 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ bool _Timestamp64_Equal_to(
>    const Timestamp64_Control *_rhs
>  )
>  {
> -  _Timestamp64_implementation_Equal_to( _lhs, _rhs );
> +  return _Timestamp64_implementation_Equal_to( _lhs, _rhs );
>  }
>  #endif
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c
> index 65a0b62..a5da43b 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ uint32_t _Timestamp64_Get_nanoseconds(
>    const Timestamp64_Control *_time
>  )
>  {
> -  _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_nanoseconds( _time );
> +  return _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_nanoseconds( _time );
>  }
>  #endif
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c
> index 0f102bc..eca0536 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ uint32_t _Timestamp64_Get_seconds(
>    const Timestamp64_Control *_time
>  )
>  {
> -  _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_seconds( _time );
> +  return _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_seconds( _time );
>  }
>  #endif
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c
> index 5c518c0..d147814 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ bool _Timestamp64_Less_than(
>    const Timestamp64_Control *_rhs
>  )
>  {
> -  _Timestamp64_implementation_Less_than( _lhs, _rhs );
> +  return _Timestamp64_implementation_Less_than( _lhs, _rhs );
>  }
>  #endif
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


More information about the devel mailing list