rtems-tester coverage patches break or1k/sis runs

[Krzysztof Mięsowicz]

Hi,

I will check this in the evening and prepare a fix - it should not be
difficult.

2014-10-02 1:57 GMT+02:00 Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org>:

> On 2/10/2014 3:44 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> Krzysztof/Hesham,
>>
>> And devel@ since this needs to be public now.
>>
>> I am trying to test or1ksim and sis using rtems-tester.
>> We need to get Krzysztof's patches merged and I am
>> just trying to run down all the issues I can.
>>
>> You both have made some changes to the repository
>> and I am having issues. Krzysztof's are on a branch
>> for me and I have attached them.  Except for the note
>> before the remains of the old email, all issues are
>> with Krzysztof's changes.
>>
>> Hesham's are all committed.
>>
>> $ ~/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test --log=or1ksim.log
>> --rtems-bsp=sis --rtems-tools=/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/tools
>> sparc-rtems4.11/c/sis/testsuites/samples/hello/
>> RTEMS Testing - Tester, v0.2.0
>> error: gdb.cfg:59: macro '%{_coverage}' not found
>> warning: switched to dry run due to errors
>> error: gdb.cfg:59: invalid if bool value:  %if %{_coverage}
>> [1/1] p:0 f:0 t:0 i:0 | sparc/sis: hello.exe
>>
>>
> There is something missing in the default configuration. The pattern often
> used in this case is to define a default if the macro is not defined before
> any logic that uses it.
>
>  When I use Krzysztof's branch with the or1ksim as shown below,
>> it adds a 1 to the end of the qemu-system-or32 invocation.
>>
>> On 10/1/2014 11:19 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
>>
>>> I cloned a vanilla RTEMS tester, and it works fine with me with the
>>> following command
>>> "~/development/rtems/test/rtems-tester/tester/rtems-test
>>> --log=or1ksim.log --rtems-bsp=or1ksim
>>> /home/hesham/build/or1k-rtems4.11/c/or1ksim/testsuites/"
>>>
>>>  But it seemed to run a long time and then I killed it when
>> I used your command.
>>
>> And when I try to run it on sis, you do need the --rtems-tools
>> argument to find the simulator. I don't know what the difference
>> for this is when doing the or1ksim. I think it should be required
>> for consistency.
>>
>
> Yes, dependence on environment variables should not occur.
>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141002/2abeb672/attachment-0002.html>