xilinx microblaze

[Hesham ALMatary]

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Joel Sherrill
<joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/2015 6:20 AM, Hesham ALMatary wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:07 PM,  <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Zitat von Hesham ALMatary <heshamelmatary at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> FYI, there's some initial port that runs hello world here [1]. I'll
>>>> most likely work on rebasing and improving it soon, and perhaps revive
>>>> the discussion of the upstreaming process, if it's of interest.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any chance, you could check it in?
>>>
>> I'd like to, but this will be subjected to some Xilinx licence issues,
>> and my schedule. So no (timing) guarantees.
>
>
> How much code is dependent on the Xilinx code?
>
Pretty much small. It's just some bits for UART lowest-level driver,
which I think it can be easily replaced by any other uart16550/RTEMS
driver.
> As much as I hate to ask, is it the port or the BSP?
> We really need a BSP that runs on a simulator to run tests
> on with a port.
>
> There is nothing preventing you two from privately sharing
> the code if you both meet the licensing terms. We just can't
> merge it.
>
> --joel



-- 
Hesham