[rtems commit] bsps/sh: Disable fileio test due to lack of memory

[Joel Sherrill]

I don't have a problem with the patch just the idea that fileio used
to fit and now it doesn't. Are we going up in size? Is gcc producing
worse code?

Any ideas? How do other targets look from a size perspective?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebh at rtems.org> wrote:

> Module:    rtems
> Branch:    master
> Commit:    08a315d76a66e7f2c5b08bc8bf6dc2753152aae1
> Changeset:
> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=08a315d76a66e7f2c5b08bc8bf6dc2753152aae1
>
> Author:    Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
> Date:      Wed Dec  9 14:23:12 2015 +0100
>
> bsps/sh: Disable fileio test due to lack of memory
>
> ---
>
>  c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh2-testsuite.tcfg | 1 +
>  c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh4-testsuite.tcfg | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh2-testsuite.tcfg
> b/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh2-testsuite.tcfg
> index 443a7a2..620d43d 100644
> --- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh2-testsuite.tcfg
> +++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh2-testsuite.tcfg
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  include: testdata/require-tick-isr.tcfg
>  include: testdata/disable-intrcritical-tests.tcfg
>
> +fileio
>  fsdosfsname01
>  iostream
>  utf8proc01
> diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh4-testsuite.tcfg
> b/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh4-testsuite.tcfg
> index 0113702..848daf3 100644
> --- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh4-testsuite.tcfg
> +++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/sh/shsim/make/custom/simsh4-testsuite.tcfg
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  include: testdata/require-tick-isr.tcfg
>  include: testdata/disable-intrcritical-tests.tcfg
>
> +fileio
>  fsdosfsname01
>  iostream
>  utf8proc01
>
> _______________________________________________
> vc mailing list
> vc at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/vc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151209/da376256/attachment.html>