[PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169)

[Jan Sommer]

Am Wednesday 02 December 2015, 08:13:20 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
> 
> On December 2, 2015 2:14:22 AM EST, Jeff Law <law at redhat.com> wrote:
> >On 12/01/2015 12:56 PM, Jan Sommer wrote:
> >> Am Monday 30 November 2015, 16:19:30 schrieb Jeff Law:
> >>> On 11/30/2015 03:06 PM, Jan Sommer wrote:
> >>>> Could someone with write access please commit the patch?
> >>>> The paperwork with the FSF has gone through. If something else is
> >missing, please tell me.
> >>>> I won't be available next week.
> >>> I'm not sure what you built your patches again, but I can't apply
> >them
> >>> to the trunk.  Can you resend a patch as a diff against the trunk.
> >>>
> >>> Often I can fix things by hand, but this is Ada and I'd be much more
> >>> likely to botch something.
> >>
> >> I updated the patches again. They should now fit with the heads of
> >the respective branches again.
> >> Maybe the Changelog will be out of synch again.
> >> The patches are for the following branches:
> >> ada-68169_4.9.diff   -->  gcc-4_9-branch
> >> ada-68169_5.x.diff  -->   gcc-5-branch
> >> ada-68169_trunk.diff --> trunk
> >>
> >> Let me know if they apply this time. I used svn diff to create them
> >and used patch -p0 to test if they apply locally.
> >THanks.  I've committed this to the trunk based on Joel's comments.
> >
> >The gcc-5 branch is frozen for the upcoming release and gcc-4.9 is 
> >regression/doc fixes only.  It'll be up to the release managers whether
> >
> >or not to backport to those branches.
> 
> Thanks Jeff. 
> 
> I would consider this a regression. RTEMS changed the pthread_attr_t when we added thread affinity and updating Ada to match slipped through. We knew it needed attention for SMP but missed this critical piece to keep it working.
> 
> Jan.. Is there a gcc PR for this? To get it on a release branch, it is better to have one.
> 

Yes, I created this one: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68169