Linker Set Based Initialization

[Joel Sherrill]

What BSPs/architectures have you tested?

Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture basis?
I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have broken
linkcmds.
Is that right?

--joel

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I checked in the support for linker sets (
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2408). Please review the API
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/score/include/rtems/linkersets.h
>
> and documentation
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/doc/user/linkersets.t
>
> carefully.  For an example please have a look at
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/sptests/splinkersets01
>
> I will change the system initialization to use linker sets in the next
> couple of weeks. Once this is done, the way back is not easy. So, now is
> the best time to address potential issues.
>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151208/47efa177/attachment-0002.html>