PowerPC BSPs with GCC Head

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Wed Jan 14 12:49:12 UTC 2015



On January 14, 2015 12:58:26 AM CST, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>As it turned out in the discussion of
>
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64576
>
>in GCC 5 we have a change of the default language
>
>https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html
>
>Lets see if this was the only problem.

I left a build of all BSPs against what GCC from the head I have last night. GCC doesn't complete building for some targets so we will have no info on those. 

But this was the only set if failures I recall from the last build.

>On 13/01/15 16:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On 1/13/2015 12:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> >Since this worked for a long time, this might be a CPP regression,
>but a
>>> >%1 parameter doesn't really look like a C construct.
>> I filed this as GCC PR 64576 and am doing a git bisect now.
>>
>> I would like to get a ruling and/or suggestion for it. This code
>> is 15 years old so gcc has accepted it a LONG time.

--joel



More information about the devel mailing list