PowerPC BSPs with GCC Head
joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Wed Jan 14 15:33:08 UTC 2015
On 1/14/2015 12:58 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> As it turned out in the discussion of
> in GCC 5 we have a change of the default language
> Lets see if this was the only problem.
Based on the overnight results, that may be the only compilation
+ A few arm BSPs have tests that don't fit into memory
+ A few PowerPC BSPs have compilation issues
+ or1ksim complains about _init/_fini
> On 13/01/15 16:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On 1/13/2015 12:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>> Since this worked for a long time, this might be a CPP regression, but a
>>>> %1 parameter doesn't really look like a C construct.
>> I filed this as GCC PR 64576 and am doing a git bisect now.
>> I would like to get a ruling and/or suggestion for it. This code
>> is 15 years old so gcc has accepted it a LONG time.
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the devel