Fwd: [PR 66854 powerpc regression] Fix RTEMS powerpc build issue

[Gedare Bloom]

in case anyone else hit this..


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Meissner <meissner at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:09 PM
Subject: [PR 66854 powerpc regression] Fix RTEMS powerpc build issue
To: gcc-patches at gcc.gnu.org, dje.gcc at gmail.com


My IEEE 128-bit floating point infrastructure patches resulted in a
segmentation violation on RTEMS when building libgcc.  I had put a test using a
type tree variable before the test whether it was NULL or not.

This patch bootstraps on 64-bit Linux, and it also fixes the problem in
question when building a RTEMS compiler.  Can this patch be installed if it
causes no further regressions for RTEMS?

2015-07-14  Michael Meissner  <meissner at linux.vnet.ibm.com>

        PR target/66854
        * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_pass_by_reference): Move test for
        null before IEEE 128-bit floating point support patch.

--
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA
email: meissner at linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
-------------- next part --------------
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c	(revision 225780)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c	(working copy)
@@ -10832,6 +10832,9 @@
 			  machine_mode mode, const_tree type,
 			  bool named ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 {
+  if (!type)
+    return 0;
+
   if (DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_V4 && TARGET_IEEEQUAD
       && FLOAT128_IEEE_P (TYPE_MODE (type)))
     {
@@ -10840,9 +10843,6 @@
       return 1;
     }
 
-  if (!type)
-    return 0;
-
   if (DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_V4 && AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
     {
       if (TARGET_DEBUG_ARG)