[SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects
joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Thu Jul 23 11:51:46 UTC 2015
On 7/23/2015 6:36 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 23/07/15 12:29, Chris Johns wrote:
>> I feel this needs to be a real API not a pseudo-internal API. Making
>> this an API means the project agrees to support the API, it has tests
>> and we have to make sure it is working for a release. Oh and it has
> For an API I suggest to use C11/C++11:
> For GCC this is done via this API:
So to parrot back a simple version of what you are proposing.
+ Add simple, self-contained objects for use in supporting
performance critical support components (e.g. FreeBSD,
gcc, newlib, OpenMP).
+ I assume that other language run-time layers may benefit
+ Use these lighter objects to reimplement gxx wrappers.
One question is how much of the C11/C++11 threading and synchronization
will be covered by self-contained objects.
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the devel