Tools for RTEMS 4.12
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Fri Nov 6 15:31:54 UTC 2015
On 06/11/15 15:12, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 5/11/2015 6:56 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> >I see no problem with using the newer GCC assuming our development
>> >cycle is probably still at least 1yr+. Until we get good automation
>> >this is the case. Also, we are planning to apply to Google Code-In,
>> >and bumping the tool versions could be a set of tasks. If you would
>> >like to do one or a few as a sample, then we can have high school
>> >students do the rest during the GCI program period.
> I am planing to talk to Joel about the RSB and it's configuration files.
> The RSB has arrived at an interesting place where I am not sure we want
> all versions in an RSB. If we strip back the configurations to just the
> valid ones we will then need to have a specific versions for specific
> releases. This would simplify the number of files.
What I noticed during creation of the 4.12 tools that a lot of includes
are involved which make it difficult to determine what is actually the
case. I would use more copy and paste, otherwise if you change e.g. the
basic GCC build file, then you would have to build a lot of stuff to
test everything. I think its better to use specific files for a specific
RTEMS version.
>
> It would be nice to resolve this before adding 4.12 support.
The 4.11 branch was created more than three months ago, we should really
provide a 4.12 tool chain soon and independent of RSB internal issues.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list