Tools for RTEMS 4.12

[Gedare Bloom]

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> On 5/11/2015 6:56 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I see no problem with using the newer GCC assuming our development
>> cycle is probably still at least 1yr+. Until we get good automation
>> this is the case. Also, we are planning to apply to Google Code-In,
>> and bumping the tool versions could be a set of tasks. If you would
>> like to do one or a few as a sample, then we can have high school
>> students do the rest during the GCI program period.
>
> I am planing to talk to Joel about the RSB and it's configuration files.
> The RSB has arrived at an interesting place where I am not sure we want
> all versions in an RSB. If we strip back the configurations to just the
> valid ones we will then need to have a specific versions for specific
> releases. This would simplify the number of files.
>
Sounds good.

> It would be nice to resolve this before adding 4.12 support.
>
And I am still thinking if we do GCI it will make a nice set of tasks.

> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel