Fwd: [rtems-source-builder] Various bugfixes for building rtems 4.9,4.10,4.11 and 4.12 (#5)

[Joel Sherrill]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> >> We probably always want the best infrastructure. And it we want to keep
> >> hosts
> >> moving forward, we will end up wanting to back port patches frequently.
> >
> > Would we be moving 4.11 to gcc-6? I just do not know but the
> > gcc-common.cfg could result in cross-talk.
> >
> I agree with branches simply for this reason. We want to keep
> "rolling" certain include config files to keep them up to date, which
> means we have to archive the release configs anyways, so we should
> have a separate copy of these files for the release versions. Just
> making that separate copy be a branch simplifies a lot.
>

FWIW I cut the 4.11 branch on the RSB but I suspect nothing has
been merged onto it.

--joel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151123/79205807/attachment-0002.html>