[PATCH 04/15] score: Add node adjust to _RBTree_Find_inline()

[Sebastian Huber]

Maybe "map"?

----- Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> schrieb:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> schrieb:
> >> I don't understand the name "adjust"? I think of adjusting as
> >> something that would cause a change or modify, which is not the case
> >> here. I don't have any great replacement, but I guess I might suggest
> >> "dereference"?
> >
> > You may adjust the pointer value, e.g. node + offset.  Dereference is wrong, since you are not supposed to do a *node.  Maybe "fixup"?
> >
> As I understand it, this callout does not modify the tree or node, so
> I would avoid using any verb that implies a change happens: fixup
> implies some modification to me. Perhaps I misunderstood, but the
> comment says the callout should "get the return value" of a found
> node. get_value() would be OK except for slight overload with POSIX
> keys. read()?
> 
> I'm not coming up with any great ideas.

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.