Build Failures on Master (mostly C++ issues)
Daniel Gutson
daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies.com
Sat Apr 9 15:26:40 UTC 2016
El 9/4/2016 12:24, "Joel Sherrill" <joel at rtems.org> escribió:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Daniel Gutson <
daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> El 9/4/2016 12:15, "Joel Sherrill" <joel at rtems.org> escribió:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > These are the BSPs which do not build all tests with C++ and the
in-tree network stack enabled:
>> >
>> > + epiphany_sim - GCC ICE building mongoose.c. No investigation.
>>
>> Gcc 6? Could you please attach more data, such as the gcc output and the
test?
>
> Most targets are like this:
>
> arm-rtems4.12-gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20160327 (RTEMS 4.12, RSB
648e2d5d6c308227c456434238da5f3f881bddc7, Newlib 2.4.0)
>
> But epiphany hasn't been merged yet and has its own issues:
>
> epiphany-rtems4.12-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20140411 (RTEMS 4.12, RSB
648e2d5d6c308227c456434238da5f3f881bddc7, Newlib
8b1ede3ce11d53292036aadfcfb6043df0235f9c)
>
> I can post the ICE but not even sure what good it would do.
We can fix it :)
>
>>
>> >
>> > + m32c - does not even build a C++ compiler. This is a small CPU and
there isn't any general support for C++. This was why it was on my list of
automatically disabled.
>>
> This is gcc 6. And I think we just disable C++ for m32c.
>
>>
>> > + moxiesim - cxx_iostream.exe fails to link bcause it can't find
__dso_handle. I don't know if C++ works for moxie-elf or if this is RTEMS
specific.
>
> This is gcc 6. It has had this issue for months. I don't think C++ has
ever worked.
> I have investigated but don't have a clue which tiny bit is wrong.
>
>>
>> > + or1k - needs newlib bumped to match tree.
>
> or1k was also using older gcc 4.9.3. It hasn't been merged yet. I am
updating it
> now to the latest newlib.
>
>>
>> > + sh/gensh4 - undefined reference to __gnu_cxx::__atomic_add(int
volatile*, int) in cxx_iostream test
>>
> This is gcc 6. It has had this issue for months. It broke when the atomic
changes
> and our C++ configuration changed. I have investigated but don't have a
clue
> which tiny bit is wrong.
>
>
>>
>> > --joel
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel at rtems.org
>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160409/8d84eb9f/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list