Fwd: [Bug debug/65779] [5 Regression] undefined local symbol on powerpc [regression]

Nick Withers nick.withers at anu.edu.au
Thu Feb 11 00:28:54 UTC 2016


On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:17 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> It looks like the PowerPC bug in GCC about local symbols is fixed.
> 
> Should we bump gcc to a git tag or the next snapshot?

We already have. See 
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2016-January/013461.html and ht
tps://git.rtems.org/rtems-source
-builder/commit/?id=e3b9fb68d480a1044d75c4cac09e638ef7483114

> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [Bug debug/65779] [5 Regression] undefined local symbol on
> powerpc [regression]
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:57:26 -0600
> From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla at gcc.gnu.org>
> To: joel at gcc.gnu.org <joel at gcc.gnu.org>
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
> 
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>             What    |Removed                     |Added
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>               Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
>           Resolution|---                         |FIXED
> 
> --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Fixed.
> 



More information about the devel mailing list