Fwd: [Bug debug/65779] [5 Regression] undefined local symbol on powerpc [regression]

[Joel Sherrill]

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Nick Withers <nick.withers at anu.edu.au>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:17 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > It looks like the PowerPC bug in GCC about local symbols is fixed.
> >
> > Should we bump gcc to a git tag or the next snapshot?
>
> We already have. See
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2016-January/013461.html and ht
> tps://git.rtems.org/rtems-source
> -builder/commit/?id=e3b9fb68d480a1044d75c4cac09e638ef7483114


Awesome! Thanks Nick!

I have noticed you have been on top of things. :)


> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: [Bug debug/65779] [5 Regression] undefined local symbol on
> > powerpc [regression]
> > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:57:26 -0600
> > From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla at gcc.gnu.org>
> > To: joel at gcc.gnu.org <joel at gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
> >
> > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> >
> >             What    |Removed                     |Added
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
> >               Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
> >           Resolution|---                         |FIXED
> >
> > --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > Fixed.
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160210/3ea0280c/attachment-0002.html>