Porting Rock on RTEMS as GSoC project

[Gedare Bloom]

Rock co-mentor is not mandatory, but highly encouraged and will
improve your project's chances to be accepted and to be successful.
You should reach out to the SOCIS student and mentors to see if they
would be willing to co-mentor for GSoC.

TinyRTEMS is not a great project currently as there are many efforts
ongoing that make this a moving target. The most likely work to be
done is to fix the remaining linkcmds files (ld linker scripts) to add
the right KEEP() directives so that our gcc per-function and
per-section optimizations work correctly. I don't see this as
sufficient for GSoC currently.

Gedare

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi
<sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been trying to reach potential co-mentors from the Rock
> community.However the response has not been that good. Is co-mentoring a
> compulsory condition? I also wanted to know if Tiny RTEMS project can be
> taken up as a GSoCproject this year.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>> You should try to get someone from the Rock or the Orocos community to
>> commit to (co-)mentor you if at all possible.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi
>> <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I am interested in working on porting Rock on RTEMS. I am currently
>> > working
>> > on replicating Matthias Goldhoorn's work. I am also trying to go through
>> > previous projects taken by Anna Vasquez for SOCIS. I wanted to know if
>> > this
>> > can be taken up as a project this year?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Sambeet
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel at rtems.org
>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>