Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

[Gedare Bloom]

The part about testing with a simulator is vague. But you can go ahead
and generate tasks. Create 1 task per architecture that remains, and
allow 5 instances for each.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> It might be good to create GCI tasks for students to get RTEMS
>> >> >> Tester
>> >> >> working for a few simulator targets that are supported?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I could be wrong but I think I created them for all gdb based
>> >> > simulators.
>> >> > There is unlikely much low hanging fruit.
>> >> >
>> >> I just meant a task to run the Tester for some target that is a
>> >> candidate for the follow-on work. That gives the potential students a
>> >> baseline.
>> >
>> >
>> > Oh... I actually wrote a task for a GCI student to do this. :)
>> >
>> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Coding/AddPerSectionSupportToBSPs
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> Save the page?
>
>
> Sorry. I am glad I didn't lose it in that length of time. I am still at home
> for the holidays and had to find a cat in the attic and then take a shower.
> :(