Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

[Joel Sherrill]

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> The part about testing with a simulator is vague. But you can go ahead
> and generate tasks. Create 1 task per architecture that remains, and
> allow 5 instances for each.
>
>
Huh? How about one per BSP Family? If we do it the way you suggest,
we will have to assign BSPs to each student as they go.

I have not gotten close to perfect at using the right reply-to address. :(


> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> It might be good to create GCI tasks for students to get RTEMS
> >> >> >> Tester
> >> >> >> working for a few simulator targets that are supported?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I could be wrong but I think I created them for all gdb based
> >> >> > simulators.
> >> >> > There is unlikely much low hanging fruit.
> >> >> >
> >> >> I just meant a task to run the Tester for some target that is a
> >> >> candidate for the follow-on work. That gives the potential students a
> >> >> baseline.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Oh... I actually wrote a task for a GCI student to do this. :)
> >> >
> >> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Coding/AddPerSectionSupportToBSPs
> >> >
> >> > What do you think?
> >> >
> >> Save the page?
> >
> >
> > Sorry. I am glad I didn't lose it in that length of time. I am still at
> home
> > for the holidays and had to find a cat in the attic and then take a
> shower.
> > :(
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160106/0cb37f9c/attachment-0002.html>