Policy for RSB branches for 4.9, 4.10 and 4.11

[Chris Johns]

On 04/03/2016 23:46, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 28/02/16 00:07, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Should we create branches for 4.9 and 4.10 in the RSB repo?
>>
>> Should the 4.9, 4.10 and 4.11 build set files and config scripts be
>> removed from master?
>>
>> I do not see the point of maintaining the branches for releases and the
>> master and I can see a situation where the 4.11 build on master, ie
>> currently 4.12, is wrong but noticeable so.
>
> In case branches are used, then we should remove the corresponding
> versions from the master. Giving users the option to build the tools for
> 4.10 from the master */4.10 directory or the 4.10 branch makes no sense.
>

Great. I will clean this up once I have python3 and python2 support 
finished.

Chris