ESA SOCIS - Porting the Monkey HTTP Server
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Tue May 3 05:23:09 UTC 2016
On 03/05/16 04:27, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 20:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> what is the benefit of the Monkey HTTP server compared to Civetweb?
> It is not mongoose or civetweb. :) Originally when I started looking
> at Monkey I was looking for something new to give us options and I
> still think this is something we should consider. I am happy to see
> both supported.
> It is nicely implemented and there are a couple of people looking
> after the code base and the related project. I like the idea of a plug
> in interface which can be statically linked.
> We had issues with kqueue in the new stack but I am sure we can find a
> suitable way to integrate it with RTEMS.
What are these issues with kqueue?
> I also think we should see if we need the sock pairs to manage events
> or we could see if we can map at a different layer and use something
> better suited to RTEMS.
The socket pairs are supported in the new network stack.
> The thread stack allocation could be improved, but this is not the
> first time we have come across issues in this area.
What is the issue here? Maybe we should add tickets for all of these
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel