PWM driver tested in RTEMS with RGB

[Gedare Bloom]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, punit vara <punitvara at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for late reply. Thank you for your detailed review. I am still
> busy this week with my academic work.I would like to have suggestions
> on my proposal.
>
> Should I change anything in my proposal like title or any other detail
> ? Any suggestions ?
>
> Is there any vim setup instruction for RTEMS coding style(i.e Linux
> community has). If not ? I would love to develop vim plugin if it is
> possible to develop in less time. It will be useful for every RTEMS
> developer.
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Martin Galvan
> <martin.galvan at tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
>> Hi Punit! Sorry for the delay; I finally got to review your code.
>> First and foremost, it'd be great if you could tell us which
>> StarterWare version/git commit are you using, so that we can keep it
>> handy when reviewing your code. Sorry if you already mentioned it, my
>> memory is a bit sketchy these days :)
>>
>> As a general comment I'd say you should keep a consistent coding style
>> throughout the code you write yourself. While the core RTEMS style
>> (spaces after parentheses, etc) isn't required in BSP code, at least
>> indentations should be correct. Indentations in RTEMS are usually two
>> spaces.
>>
>> More on coding style later.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:48 PM, punit vara <punitvara at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This is my first patch I already sent you when I successfully merged TI SW code.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/punitvara/rtems_gsoc16/tree/master/pwm/patch
>>
>> I take it you're referring to 0001-add-new-pwm-driver.patch. A few comments:
>>
>> 1) Whenever possible, try to keep the original coding style for
>> imported code. This makes it easier to track changes and such. Same
>> goes for e.g. the order in which functions are declared (e.g.
>> EHRPWMConfigureAQActionOnA and B).
>>
>> 2) I think you should add the TI license to bbb-pwm.c as well. It
>> would also be really nice if you added a comment atop the imported
>> files saying which SW version/git commit they come from.
>
> https://github.com/punitvara/rtems_gsoc16/blob/master/pwm/patch/0001-PWM-successful-code-added.patch
>
> I added Ti licence at last patch. Do I need to add any other licence ?
Whenever you copy/paste code, you need to know/observe what the
license is and keep track of that. So, the question of whether you
need to add another license depends on whether you copied code from
somewhere that has a different license.

> I will update my local repo with your other suggestion. I considered
> all your suggestions. I will soon generate some patches and show you.
> Then you can guide me further.
>
> Once again thank you for mentoring every one.
>
> Regards,
> Punit Vara