Validity of a patch on newlib

[Joel Sherrill]

For 4.10, the tools are on a different track than the master. They
are frozen to older tools.

The URL has a few issues:

+ rtems.com reference should be rtems.org
+ After the hosting moved to OSU OSL, we went from one IP address
   for all machines to a unique name/IP per service. So
   www.rtems.org != ftp.rtems.org
+ ftp site reorganization
+ that SOURCES directory was based on the assumption RTEMS
   provided RPMs for tools and that directory got updated.

Taken all together, look here:

https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/4.10/tools/

It looks like a newer newlib patch is there.

But I would just use those as a reference and try to build from the RTEMS
git master with new tools.

--joel

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> I believe those patches aren't needed any more, as we have worked to
> submit our patches upstream and use newlib snapshots and releases
> directly. You should refer to the source versions identified by the
> RSB, and see whether it applies any patches, to understand what source
> it compiles to build a tool chain.
>
> Gedare
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi
> <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was going through the old scripts o porting Rock on RTEMS.While
> building
> > the rtems version 4.10.1  a patch was used namely
> >
> >
> http://www.rtems.com/ftp/pub/rtems/SOURCES/4.10/newlib-1.18.0-rtems4.10-20110518.diff
> >
> > This url gives a page not found error now. I am now modifying the scripts
> > for rtems4.11.Where can I find the necessary patches? I don't want to
> use th
> > RSB now so that i understand the building procedure step by step. Can
> > someone help?
> > regards
> > Sambeet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160519/27db3c67/attachment-0002.html>