Building All Output Formats for RTEMS Docs

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Mon Nov 7 22:23:42 UTC 2016


On 07/11/2016 19:27, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>
> with your patch that removes lato and inconsolata, there are now fewer packages necessary on Arch. It is now not longer necessary to install the quite large texlive-fontsextra (nearly 700MB). Beneath that, the pygmentize packet has somehow been lost in my original patch to the README.
>
> I appended a patch that will remove texlive-fontsextra from the Arch Linux section of the README and add pygmentize again.
>

I have taken a closer look at the finished output and it is not as good 
which is why the fonts were used before. I am now wondering if we detect 
the better fonts and use them when present.

If we move to generate docs based on the lowest common denominator we 
may end up with docs that are not the best we could have that reflects 
on the project.

Chris


More information about the devel mailing list