Raspberry Pi 2 SMP pushed to the master - Was: [PATCH 11 minor addeum] ...
ppisa4lists at pikron.com
Wed Sep 7 20:33:24 UTC 2016
Hello Sebastian, Alan and others,
On Wednesday 07 of September 2016 09:27:21 Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > should they go to the same compilation unit as _CPU_SMP_Start_processor
> > or bspsmp-init.c separate one.
> > Or I should not care about smpfatal08 or add required symbol to it.
> It would be nice to get the smpfatal08 to work with this BSP. There is
> already a special case for the the qoriq BSPs in this test, so maybe we
> need something similar for the RPI.
I have cleanly divided file startup/bspsmp.c into two parts
startup/bspsmp_api.c which holds SuperCore requred/defined functions
which are replaced by smpfatal08
startup/bspsmp_init.c which holds IPI and secondary CPU initialization
This way there is no need to polute smpfatal08 by BSP specific code.
Because there is no functional/code change from already published
series, I have pushed patch series into master.
Thanks for review and Alan Cudmore for number of testing rounds.
More information about the devel