4.11.2rc1 Build Results

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Mon Apr 3 21:53:16 UTC 2017

On 03/04/2017 23:10, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
> Looks good except for the architectures that toolsets did not
> build for.
> + avr (don't care)
> + lm32
> + moxie
> + m32c
> moxie has the binutils mismatch ticket but after that is fixed,
> there is a missing gcc support library to track down why it isn't
> built.
> lm32 can build the toolset but since rtems is built as part of
> the same RSB set and that build failed, the toolset didn't get
> installed.
> m32c is the same as lm32.
> This makes it look like to me that building RTEMS at the same
> time as the toolset is not always desirable. Without the toolset
> installed, it isn't easy to fix the BSP.

You do not need to build RTEMS, just add `--without-rtems` to the RSB 
options. All that changes between development and releases is the default.

> But overall, I say it looks good to ship.

I need #2953 and #2950 fixed to create the release. I hope these tickets 
are resolved so I can make a release.


More information about the devel mailing list