Ideas Needed for GCC internal Specs

[Joel Sherrill]

On Dec 23, 2017 6:08 PM, "Chris Johns" <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

On 24/12/17 2:44 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I have tried the following patch with gcc's master on the sparc/erc32
with an
> empty bsp_specs. It still is linking with crt0.o. I don't see where it is
coming
> from.
> Do I have a subtle typo or is there something else I am missing?

Is there a default in ld?


I have no idea. Was going to see if I could remove just the end_file
portion of our bsp_specs and then ask on GCC for some advice.

I think I am.missing something magic.

This may not be the final state of the solution but we have to empty the
bsp_specs before we can move on.


Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20171223/0af6f388/attachment-0002.html>