[PATCH] Use a hash file for GCC only

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Wed Mar 8 22:52:51 UTC 2017

On 08/03/2017 17:10, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 07/03/17 23:24, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 03/03/2017 02:23, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> In a way, I do like that this shows the different gcc-newlib versions
>>> we use. It might be nice to add a bit of organization to this hashes
>>> file and/or documentation of the procedure for adding/removing
>>> entries.
>>> Maybe it makes more sense to have a separate file for each version
>>> being used, e.g. a gcc-4.8.3 hash file, gcc-4.9.3, gcc-6.0.1, etc?
>>> That should make it easier to maintain the hashes.
>>> I'll leave it to Chris to decide if this is a suitable compromise.
>> This seems to have stalled and I have had to push the change to fix
>> builds on FreeBSD 11.0 so reverting the change is not possible.
>> Please apply this patch. We can look at further improvement as future
>> refactoring work.
> After the comments in this thread I sent an alternative patch that
> removes the hash file:

I am sorry, I must have missed it.

> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017-March/017102.html
> Which one do you like?

This is fine.


More information about the devel mailing list