timeouts and failure

[Tanu Hari Dixit]

Hello Chris, All,

Regarding the ticket https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2946
for the test spcontext01 do we need to add a tag in a new .tcfg file  ?
If so what would be the name of the tcfg file?

Also, can you please help me investigate why 5 more test fail?

Thanks,
Tanu Hari Dixit.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit <tokencolour at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I noticed you have 17 tests more than I do enabled. How did you configure?
>
> ../../rtems/configure --target=sparc-rtems4.12 --enable-tests
> --enable-rtemsbsp=erc32
> --prefix=/home/thd/development/rtems/install_path_erc32_alltest_new
>
> I used Joel's configuration, that is:
> ../../rtems/configure --target=sparc-rtems4.12 --enable-rtemsbsp=erc32
> --prefix=/home/thd/development/rtems/install_path_erc32_js
> --disable-networking --enable-posix --disable-multiprocessing
> --disable-smp --enable-tests --enable-cxx --enable-maintainer-mode
>
> I got the following results:
> Passed:   540
> Failed:     6
> Timeouts:   9
> Invalid:    0
> -------------
> Total:    555
>
> Failures:
>  spcontext01.exe
>  mdosfs_fsscandir01.exe
>  jffs2_fsscandir01.exe
>  imfs_fsscandir01.exe
>  mimfs_fsscandir01.exe
>  mrfs_fsscandir01.exe
> Timeouts:
>  fsdosfsname01.exe
>  fsdosfswrite01.exe
>  fsimfsconfig02.exe
>  fsimfsgeneric01.exe
>  fsjffs2gc01.exe
>  fsdosfsformat01.exe
>  fsrfsbitmap01.exe
>  imfs_fserror.exe
>  crypt01.exe
> Average test time: 0:00:01.434556
> Testing time     : 0:13:16.178701
>
>
> This is still one more test than Joel's total. I understand
> spcontext01.exe is expected to fail. But I can't figure out why the
> rest fail on my host. (My rtems source tree is updated.)
>
> Also, how can we change the number of cores operational? I found the
> --timeout option but none regarding the cores.
>
> Can the devs please help me with this?
>
> Thanking you,
> Tanu Hari Dixit.
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>> On 20/03/2017 17:20, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/03/17 21:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FWIW here are my results for sparc/erc32:
>>>>
>>>> Passed:   548
>>>> Failed:     1
>>>> Timeouts:   5
>>>> Invalid:    0
>>>> -------------
>>>> Total:    554
>>>>
>>>> Failures:
>>>>  spcontext01.exe
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, this is expected.
>>>
>>>> Timeouts:
>>>>  fileio.exe
>>>>  top.exe
>>>>  termios.exe
>>>>  capture.exe
>>>>  monitor.exe
>>>
>>>
>>> These tests should terminate after 20 seconds or so without input. A
>>> timeout should therefore not occur.
>>
>>
>> That is 20 seconds of target time and not real-time if running on a heavily
>> loaded machine running simulators in parallel. The test tool's timeout is
>> real time.
>>
>> I have created https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2946 to look into this.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>