GCC 7.1 Released

[Joel Sherrill]

On May 12, 2017 3:42 AM, "Chris Johns" <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

On 12/05/2017 18:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:

> On 12/05/17 10:35, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/2017 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/05/17 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
>> I talked to Joel late his time yesterday and he is reporting increased
>> code size and as a result some tests are not fitting into the target.
>> Rather than head on into the change we think it is better to step back
>> and visit it again after we have a release. What do you think?
>>
>
> A code size increase would be not an issue for me if its in the range of
> a small percent range. However, we should identify this and create a GCC
> PR.
>
> Gaisler suggested to use GCC 7.1. Did Gaisler observe some significant
> code size changes on SPARC?
>
>
Sorry I do not have any detail. I am sure Joel can provide some when he is
online and has some time.

I think all he did was build all the BSPs with tests and saw some new
failures.


21 BSPs failed to link some.test due to a memory overflow. Mix or at least
arm and 68k

4am here. I will post when i am really awake.b



Chris

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel at rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170512/8edfa66b/attachment-0002.html>