GSOC student question

[Sichen Zhao]

I am sorry  but can you give me some suggestion about that, you mean the old i2c works on all platforms, and shouldn't be replace,  so where you suggest the new one should go and how to mark the old one deprecated?

Best Regards
Sichen Zhao

________________________________
From: Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 11:56 PM
To: Gedare Bloom
Cc: Sichen Zhao; RTEMS; punit vara; Christian Mauderer
Subject: Re: GSOC student question



On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org<mailto:gedare at rtems.org>> wrote:
I think the i2c was developed and tested only on the BeagleBone Black.
I don't think anyone has used the xm yet, though I could be mistaken.

Yes, I believe the old one should be replaced by the updated version.

This is likely a stupid question. Do we have confidence that the new i2c works
on all platforms that the old one did?

--joel

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sichen Zhao <zsc19940506 at outlook.com<mailto:zsc19940506 at outlook.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on my GSOC project- Beaglebone BSP projects
> There is a question, Is the code in beagle/misc/i2c.c for the beagle bone or
> for the beagle xm or other processor?
> I developed the i2c for Beaglebone Black(AM335X), So if i need remove the
> old one i2c.c in misc when i send the patch?
>
> Best Regards
> Sichen Zhao

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170523/61b56bfc/attachment-0002.html>