GSOC student question

[Ben Gras]

Dear all,


On 05/22/2017 11:56 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org
> <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>> wrote:
>
>     I think the i2c was developed and tested only on the BeagleBone Black.
>     I don't think anyone has used the xm yet, though I could be mistaken.
>
>     Yes, I believe the old one should be replaced by the updated version.
>
>
> This is likely a stupid question. Do we have confidence that the new
> i2c works
> on all platforms that the old one did?

The previous i2c implementation in the beagle bsp never worked on
hardware, only to a limited degree in qemu; replacing it won't make
anything worse for anyone.

>
> --joel 
>
>
>     On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sichen Zhao
>     <zsc19940506 at outlook.com <mailto:zsc19940506 at outlook.com>> wrote:
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > I am working on my GSOC project- Beaglebone BSP projects
>     > There is a question, Is the code in beagle/misc/i2c.c for the
>     beagle bone or
>     > for the beagle xm or other processor?
>     > I developed the i2c for Beaglebone Black(AM335X), So if i need
>     remove the
>     > old one i2c.c in misc when i send the patch?
>     >
>     > Best Regards
>     > Sichen Zhao
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170526/d5f14202/attachment-0002.html>