GSOC student question

[Sichen Zhao]

Ok, i know what you mean, i will remove the old i2c driver in my latest version of i2c.

Best Regards
Sichen Zhao

________________________________________
From: devel <devel-bounces at rtems.org> on behalf of Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 23:12
To: Ben Gras
Cc: rtems-devel at rtems.org
Subject: Re: GSOC student question

On May 26, 2017 9:59 AM, "Ben Gras" <beng at shrike-systems.com<mailto:beng at shrike-systems.com>> wrote:

Dear all,

On 05/22/2017 11:56 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:


On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org<mailto:gedare at rtems.org>> wrote:
I think the i2c was developed and tested only on the BeagleBone Black.
I don't think anyone has used the xm yet, though I could be mistaken.

Yes, I believe the old one should be replaced by the updated version.

This is likely a stupid question. Do we have confidence that the new i2c works
on all platforms that the old one did?

The previous i2c implementation in the beagle bsp never worked on hardware, only to a limited degree in qemu; replacing it won't make anything worse for anyone.

Thanks Ben. That is precisely the information needed.


--joel

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sichen Zhao <zsc19940506 at outlook.com<mailto:zsc19940506 at outlook.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on my GSOC project- Beaglebone BSP projects
> There is a question, Is the code in beagle/misc/i2c.c for the beagle bone or
> for the beagle xm or other processor?
> I developed the i2c for Beaglebone Black(AM335X), So if i need remove the
> old one i2c.c in misc when i send the patch?
>
> Best Regards
> Sichen Zhao




_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel at rtems.org<mailto:devel at rtems.org>
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel at rtems.org<mailto:devel at rtems.org>
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel