GSOC student question

[Joel Sherrill]

On May 26, 2017 9:59 AM, "Ben Gras" <beng at shrike-systems.com> wrote:

Dear all,

On 05/22/2017 11:56 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:



On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> I think the i2c was developed and tested only on the BeagleBone Black.
> I don't think anyone has used the xm yet, though I could be mistaken.
>
> Yes, I believe the old one should be replaced by the updated version.
>

This is likely a stupid question. Do we have confidence that the new i2c
works
on all platforms that the old one did?


The previous i2c implementation in the beagle bsp never worked on hardware,
only to a limited degree in qemu; replacing it won't make anything worse
for anyone.


Thanks Ben. That is precisely the information needed.



--joel

>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sichen Zhao <zsc19940506 at outlook.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am working on my GSOC project- Beaglebone BSP projects
> > There is a question, Is the code in beagle/misc/i2c.c for the beagle
> bone or
> > for the beagle xm or other processor?
> > I developed the i2c for Beaglebone Black(AM335X), So if i need remove the
> > old one i2c.c in misc when i send the patch?
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Sichen Zhao
>



_______________________________________________
devel mailing listdevel at rtems.orghttp://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel at rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170526/174887f6/attachment-0002.html>