[PATCH] Upgrade to 5.0.0

[Joel Sherrill]

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 09/11/2017 17:24, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> 2. Documentation website repo. Easy.
> >
> > I don't know how to do this.
> >
>
> https://git.rtems.org/chrisj/rtems-admin.git/
>
> >> 3. Release procedure repo. Easy.
> >
> > Do we really need another repo? Could we please place this to the tools
> or RTEMS.
> >
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-release/
>
> I am ok with is being here for now.
>
> >> 5. Trac wiki. Medium(?). A wiki search of 4.12 gives 21 hits.
> >
> > This is probably the most important area to fix:
> >
> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Release
> >
> > I will do this today.
>
> Thanks. I added a note on the 4.12 page to say why it had gone.
>
> > I can assure you that I will actively work to make a RTEMS 5.1 release
> happen in
> > this century.
>
> Haha. I thought we needed at least 2 developer babies per release?
>
> >
> >> I can do 1, 2, 3, and a bit of 4. I
> >> will look after the https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Release/ tree and the
> top
> >> level. All I am after is an understanding these things will get done
> because the
> >> patches you have posted are the first thing to change and the other
> parts need
> >> to follow as soon as possible after that or we end up with a confusing
> message.
> >
> > I hope that we are done with this by end of next week.
> >
>
> Great. I am generating build results for a few hosts. The will appear over
> the
> next few hours.
>
> >> We should also have a formal announcement about the change and reason.
> >
> > Yes, who will do this?
> >
>
> I will work with Joel on this.
>

Sebastian had a ticket (I think) that listed some of the major things that
have
happened architecturally that warrant the bump. That info would be good
to include.

My question about the version number went unanswered. Is this the point
were we are switching to two digit versions? This thread has 5.0.0 in the
title (3 digits, no change in style)  but the current tools are "*-rtems5"
which
implies two digit release numbering.  Can I get a clarification on that?


>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20171109/a4bce992/attachment-0002.html>