[PATCH] posix: Ignore pshared for semaphores

[Sebastian Huber]

----- Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> schrieb:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> 
> > Ok,  but why do you think that this is an error?  We can share the
> > synchronization objects among processes.
> >
> 
> We don't have processes. How do you propose to share between
> processes when RTEMS is fundamentally a single process system.

Yes, its a single process system. So, it is very easy to support sharing between processes. Why should creating a process-shared synchronization object fail only because its impossible to create a second process?

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.