[PATCH] posix: Ignore pshared for semaphores
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Tue Sep 12 05:10:20 UTC 2017
On 11/09/17 16:03, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> ----- Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> schrieb:
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sebastian Huber <
>> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, but why do you think that this is an error? We can share the
>>> synchronization objects among processes.
>>>
>> We don't have processes. How do you propose to share between
>> processes when RTEMS is fundamentally a single process system.
> Yes, its a single process system. So, it is very easy to support sharing between processes. Why should creating a process-shared synchronization object fail only because its impossible to create a second process?
>
I would like to remove this process-shared error also from the other
POSIX synchronization objects:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3125
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3126
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list