the generated coverage report doesn't contain any data
Vijay Kumar Banerjee
vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 16 21:52:41 UTC 2018
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 03:19 Joel Sherrill, <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 17 April 2018 at 01:43, Cillian O'Donnell <cpodonnell8 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 April 2018 at 17:46, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>>>> vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> current status :
>>>>> the coverage is running now with rtems-test and generating the report,
>>>>> however, the report doesn't show any data.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've been lurking as you have been making progress. Now you have crossed
>>>> into something you probably need some hints at. Some things to check:
>>>>
>>>> + Obviously, check output for signs that something didn't happen right.
>>>> Anything from a path wrong, etc. The configuration has to be right to
>>>> point to the source code, object code, executables, etc.
>>>>
>>>> + A lot of source code has moved around since last summer. Check
>>>> that it is looking in the right places inside RTEMS.
>>>>
>>>> + Does the mechanism to get debug information actually work? Cillian?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The covoar debug option just disables the cleaning of the tempfiles to
>>> take a look, so it's not as powerful as it might seem :)... I always used
>>> gdb here so that's probably the way to go.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> + There is a utility named trace-converter. Make sure your qemu traces
>>>> have information in them.
>>>>
>>>> + Cillian probably has guidance on running it just on one test (say
>>>> ticker)
>>>> so you can see every step.
>>>>
>>>> + Check that the executables have symbolic information. "file" should
>>>> show if they are stripped or not.
>>>>
>>>> I recall covoar has a verbose mode which should be of use.
>>>>
>>>> Cillian .. do you have instructions on running covoar in gdb?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Alright so run rtems-test with --no-clean option to leave the coverage
>>> files lying around
>>>
>>> $HOME/development/rtems/test/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test
>>> --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5 --log=coverage-analysis.log
>>> --rtems-bsp=leon3_qemu --coverage --no-clean
>>> --rtems-builddir=$HOME/development/rtems/leon3
>>> sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples
>>>
>>> Then run
>>>
>>> gdb covoar
>>>
>>> from gdb prompt
>>>
>>> run -S /home/cpod/coverage_test/leon3/coverage/score.symcfg -O
>>> /home/cpod/coverage_test/leon3/test/score -fQEMU -Tsparc-rtems5
>>> -E/home/cpod/development/rtems/test/test/vijay/rtems-tools/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/Explanations.txt
>>> -c.cov -eexe -pRTEMS-5
>>> /home/cpod/development/rtems/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/base_sp/base_sp.exe
>>>
>>> The options there are ( if you're wondering )
>>>
>>> -c COVERAGEFILE_EXTENSION EXECUTABLE1 ... EXECUTABLE2
>>>
>>> -v - verbose output
>>> -T TARGET - architecture target name
>>> -f FORMAT - simulator format
>>> (RTEMS, QEMU, TSIM or Skyeye)
>>> -E EXPLANATIONS - file of explanations
>>> -s SYMBOLS_FILE - symbols of interest
>>> -S SYMBOL_SET_FILE - path to symbol_sets.cfg
>>> -1 EXECUTABLE - executable to get symbols from
>>> -e EXE_EXTENSION - suffix for executables
>>> -c COVERAGEFILE_EXT - coverage file suffix
>>> -g GCNOS_LIST - list of *.gcno files
>>> -p PROJECT_NAME - name of the project
>>> -O Output_Directory - output directory default=.
>>> -d debug - disable cleaning of tempfiles.
>>>
>>>
>> maybe the problem is here . I am getting an error for the -S . Here are
>> the list of options that show up , capital S for symbol_set_file is not one
>> of them .
>>
>> Usage: /home/lunatic/development/rtems/5/bin/covoar [-v] -T TARGET -f
>> FORMAT [-E EXPLANATIONS] -e EXE_EXTENSION -c COVERAGEFILE_EXTENSION
>> EXECUTABLE1 ... EXECUTABLE2
>>
>> -v - verbose at initialization
>> -T TARGET - target name
>> -f FORMAT - coverage file format (RTEMS, QEMU, TSIM or
>> Skyeye)
>> -E EXPLANATIONS - name of file with explanations
>> -s SYMBOLS_FILE - name of file with symbols of interest
>> -1 EXECUTABLE - name of executable to get symbols from
>> -e EXE_EXTENSION - extension of the executables to analyze
>> -c COVERAGEFILE_EXTENSION - extension of the coverage files to analyze
>> -g GCNOS_LIST - name of file with list of *.gcno files
>> -p PROJECT_NAME - name of the project
>> -C ConfigurationFileName - name of configuration file
>> -O Output_Directory - name of output directory (default=.
>>
>
> Is it processed by the getopts switch statement in main() but not listed
> in the usage? That is
> an easy mistake to creep in.
>
It gives an "invalid option" error
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Just trying it there, it runs into segmentation fault. So trying to
>>> access memory it shouldn't.
>>>
>>> Starting program: /home/cpod/covoar -S
>>> /home/cpod/coverage_test/leon3/coverage/score.symcfg -O
>>> /home/cpod/coverage_test/leon3/test/score -fQEMU -Tsparc-rtems5
>>> -E/home/cpod/development/rtems/test/test/vijay/rtems-tools/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/Explanations.txt
>>> -c.cov -eexe -pRTEMS-5
>>> /home/cpod/development/rtems/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/base_sp/base_sp.exe
>>> Reading configuration symbol set file:
>>> /home/cpod/coverage_test/leon3/coverage/score.symcfg
>>>
>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>> 0x00007ffff7b769bb in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
>>> std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
>>> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
>>> std::allocator<char> > const&) ()
>>> from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
>>>
>>> Ahhh feels good to have error messages back.
>>>
>>> Oh also build covoar with no optimization and you'll have an easier time
>>> looking at stuff in gdb
>>>
>>> cd rtems-tools/tester/covoar
>>>
>>> vim wscript and change the '-O2' to '-O0' and then build again with waf
>>> and use that covoar to with gdb
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- vijay
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180416/1a976b07/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list