no-preinstall: Architecture-specific header files

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Mon Jan 22 21:03:54 UTC 2018


On 19/1/18 6:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> the architecture-specific header files are currently in:
> 
> cpukit/score/cpu/@RTEMS_CPU@
> 
> For example:
> 
> cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/rtems/score/cpu.h
> 
> The new include directory for architecture-specific header files after the
> preinstall removal is:
> 
> cpukit/score/cpu/@RTEMS_CPU@/include
> 
> For example:
> 
> cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/cpu.h
> 
> There are two problems with this.
> 
> 1. It introduces yet another sub-directory and makes the path longer.
> 
> 2. It moves header files which are in this place since 1999. Using
> cpukit/score/cpu/@RTEMS_CPU@ as the include directory would avoid this.
> 

Thank you for raising this. It is bit inconsistent.

> This should be the last time we move header files around. It is very easy to
> move include directories in the no-preinstall branch.
> 
> Other options for architecture-specific header files are:
> 
> cpukit/score/cpu/@RTEMS_CPU@

If this has source files and maybe private headers we should not add use this path.

> 
> cpukit/@RTEMS_CPU@/include
> 
> cpukit/arch/@RTEMS_CPU@/include
> 
> cpukit/cpu/@RTEMS_CPU@/include
> 
> cpukit/include/@RTEMS_CPU@

I think this is a good place but I am concerned about 2 -I paths, one a sub path
of another. Is that a problem?

> 
> arch/@RTEMS_CPU@/include
> 
> include/@RTEMS_CPU@
> 
> The general include files are now in:
> 
> cpukit/include
> 
> Another option would be:
> 
> include
> 
> What do you think?
> 

I am not sure.

Chris



More information about the devel mailing list