coverage : error when running --coverage with rtems-test for whole testsuites

[Vijay Kumar Banerjee]

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 9:19 PM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 20 July 2018 at 19:44, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> >> <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I used the following command
> >> >
> >> > ====================
> >> > $HOME/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test \
> >> > --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5 --log=coverage_analysis.log \
> >> > --no-clean --coverage=score --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu-cov \
> >> >
> >> >
> /home/lunatic/development/rtems/kernel/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites
> >> > --debug-trace=cov
> >> > ====================
> >> >
> >> > and I'm getting the following error
> >> >
> >> > ===================
> >> > error: coverage: covoar failure:: -9
> >> > ===================
> >> >
> >>
> >> What does error code -9 mean from covoar?
> >>
> > I don't know what does code -9 mean.
> > The error is coming from here
> >
> https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-tools/blob/master/tester/rt/coverage.py#L329
> >
>
> I should have said, "Can you figure out what error code -9 means?"
> You'll have to trace back to find where it originates.
>
I am looking into it.

> > I will run coverage for testsuites/ again and upload the log file here.
> >>
> >> Does it make any progress at all?
> >>
> > The tests are running but coverage doesn't progress at all.
> >>
> >> > This, however, runs fine for samples/
> >> >
> >>
> >> does this command work for you without using the cov options?
> >>
> > yes
> >>
> >> > I think this will probably be on hold as Chris seems to be
> >> > on a break, meanwhile, I want to do a wrapup work on
> >> > the non-gcov coverage reports, I seek suggestions/advice
> >> > for the same.
> >> >
> >> > The current state is that the coverage reports can be generated
> >> > for one symbol-set only, There's a ticket for the support of
> >> > generating separate reports of multiple sets from covoar.
> >> >
> >> > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3441
> >> >
> >> > Please let me know of any suggestions including suggestions
> >> > regarding documentation as Coverage needs more
> >> > documentation.
> >> >
> >>
> >> What is the existing documentation for coverage?
> >>
> > I found these links
> >
> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/UserManual/RTEMS_Coverage_Analysis
> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coverage/Theory
> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coverage/Analysis
> >
>
> We need to capture this stuff in a proper manual. At least it could
> start as a chapter in the user manual, maybe? @Joel ideas?
>
> >> > Thanks
> >> > -- vijay
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > devel mailing list
> >> > devel at rtems.org
> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180720/4746c8a2/attachment-0002.html>