[POSIX Benchmark Test] psxtmmqrcvblock01 made (GCI 2018)

[Shashvat Jain]

ok , that makes sense

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:20 PM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:

> I agree we want to reduce the overall number of executables but the timing
> tests which block
> need a large set of tasks which do precisely the right thing. You have to
> be very careful not to
> accidentally measure the overhead of _Thread_Handler or any odd
> initialization.
>
> I am happy to see the cases which don't block or unblock merged into
> single cases. The
> newly added pthread attr tmtest has a lot of cases. But blocking,
> unblocking, and preemption
> cases need to be separate. They are very precise tests and hard to make
> sure they measure
> exactly what you think they measure without extras.
>
> --joel
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:30 AM Shashvat Jain <shashvatjain2002 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I asked that before starting to make the test and Dr. Joel asked me to
>> make a separate one
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:35 PM Sebastian Huber <
>> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Do we really need separate test programs for all these test cases? Can't
>>> we just add this to psxtmmq01?
>>>
>>> The reason for this is that it needs time to load a test program to the
>>> target.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>>>
>>> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
>>> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
>>> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
>>> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>>> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>>>
>>> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20181116/87bb4957/attachment-0002.html>