powerpc/mpc5643l_dpu: psxconfig01 too large

Joel Sherrill joel at rtems.org
Thu Feb 28 23:10:03 UTC 2019


On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 5:03 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 1/3/19 10:00 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 4:50 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> > <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     This test has a number of config values that overflow the memory on
> the
> >     powerpc/mpc5643l_dpu BSP. Can these value be reduced so they can fit?
> >
> >     I can provide support in .tcfg files now to provide specific per BSP
> settings
> >     but I am not sure what the values should be for this BSP? Some
> guidance is most
> >     welcome.
> > Unfortunately I think this is a test like the old sp09 which crammed too
> much
> > into one executable. I think it needs to be split into multiple tests.
> Ideally
> > one per object class.
>
> That would work. I am wondering about values like 37, 41, 43, etc ...
>

>From my reading of the test 3 would be effective.


> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_BARRIERS 2
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_MESSAGE_QUEUES 7
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PARTITIONS 37
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PERIODS 41
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_REGIONS 43
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_SEMAPHORES 47
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TASKS 11
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TIMERS 59
> #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_USER_EXTENSIONS 17
>
> They look unusual enough to mean something or they are random, I cannot
> tell.
>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190228/4143cc07/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the devel mailing list