SIS with coverage support
joel at rtems.org
Wed Jan 23 23:45:45 UTC 2019
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:45 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> On 24/1/19 9:12 am, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> > After some trial and error, I got covoar to run with:
> > However, the coverage is always 0% in the summary report:
> Does adding -v to the command line provide any more detail? Repeating -v
> increases the level but things can become rather verbose and if you trip
> DWARF tracing there is a lot of output.
I would be suspicious of the code that is invoked around
CoverageReaderTSIM.cc:83 as a starting point. For some method you
know you should be analyzed, there should be aCoverageMap. Since you
are looking at only one executable, you could hard-code a test with
address range of a single method under test to see what happens.
Then if the "cover" variable isn't set correctly, then it won't have
I don't see any recent changes to the CoverageReaderQemu.cc so this
probably is something wrong with the coverage data read from the file.
If I had to guess.
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel