[PATCH v2] rtems-record: New program
chrisj at rtems.org
Thu Jan 31 23:15:03 UTC 2019
On 31/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 30/01/2019 22:11, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 30/1/19 9:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Update #3665.
>>> misc/record/record-client.c | 448 ++++++++++++++
>> What about placing this in:
>> For important parts of the tools, for example linkers and tester, there is a
>> separate directory. I am sure there will be more trace tools overtime.
> I placed it here to avoid some copy and paste in the wscript file. Are these
> sub-directory wscript files really necessary?
We should look at what makes sense long term then update the waf support to
handle the structure. I think a place to collect all eco-system trace code is
important. It encourages a collective rather than separate misc commands.
If we are starting to have repeated patterns then maybe we should refactor those
into a python module and import it.
More information about the devel