chrisj at rtems.org
Thu Jul 11 06:58:51 UTC 2019
On 11/7/19 4:53 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11/07/2019 08:45, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 11/7/19 4:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> I sent a GCC patch doing this a couple of year ago and it was rejected. The
>>> alternative was to add a separate libjffs2.a.
>> I could not find anything about this with google to see why.
> I think using separate libraries for things which depend on libz.a is all right.
Oh posted here, I checked gcc lists. :)
Patch looks fine to me. We should attempt to resolve anything that is
automatically pulled in by gcc. If the argument for -lz holds then -lrtems*
should be reconsidered and removed.
More information about the devel