GSoC PRU: simplebus vs nexus
nilhoel1 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 22 11:30:24 UTC 2019
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 13:35, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 18/07/2019 12:58, Nils Hölscher wrote:
> > Hi,
> > What is the state of simplebus in rtems-libbsd?
> It works fine.
> > I found the simplebus files in the rtems-libbsd repository, but when
> > building the compiler is not able to resolve the following include:
> > #include<dev/fdt/simplebus.h>
> Not all header files are installed with a "./waf install". You can add
> libbsd based drivers to "rtemsbsd/sys/dev".
This worked for simplebus.h, thank you.
But currently I need to add tree/freebsd/sys/arm/ti/ti_prcm.h and other
files located here.
My include would be:" #include <arm/ti/ti_prcm.h>"
Simply copying them to "rtemsbsd/sys/dev" doesn't work for these files.
> > Should I go with nexus instead as described in this Blog from 2015 or is
> > it outdated?
> Yes, device tree based BSPs should use the simplebus.
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP : Public key available on request.
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel