Change Control Board (CCB) proposal for requirements

[Sebastian Huber]

----- Am 23. Jul 2019 um 17:30 schrieb joel joel at rtems.org:

> One random thought is how to ensure that patches from people with
> hardware who submit patches to fix bugs get through the process.
> We have generally trusted people who have hardware. This is common
> for boards none of us have.
> 
> Also we have relied on a timeout rule and a level of significance. Like
> yesterday
> I committed a one-character fix for an error message in ticker.
> 
> There is also a level of significance where a ticket is required.
> 
> Yes we generally want an independent review but we have generally
> all had a threshold where that's needed.

Ok, I will try to mix in some common sense in the next version.

What do you think about the digital signature stuff? Is this overkill? Could it be something which NASA would use? I didn't talk with ESA about this (they are currently on holidays). It is just some idea I had this weekend.