[PATCH v2] [rsb] Update Spike build

[Hesham Almatary]

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 23:15, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 5:20 AM Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 04:01, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 28/10/19 9:21 am, Hesham Almatary wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 at 20:54, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
>> > > <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >     On 27/10/19 9:37 pm, Hesham Almatary wrote:
>> > >     > Yeah fesvr is now part of Spike in-tree. I didn't like it had to be
>> > >     > built separately either [1].
>> > >     >
>> > >     > Joel, AFAIR, dtc was always needed.
>> > >
>> > >     Please have the package build FDT if it is needed. Do no rely on it being
>> > >     installed as some hosts do not have a package to install.
>> > >
>> > > I think Joel has already added it
>> > > https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-source-builder/blob/master/bare/config/devel/spike.bset#L7
>> > >
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > The config file has some issues. I am fixing the %hash issues. Is the patch
>> > still needed if the version used has the fix?
>> >
>> The version that has the fix is a recent one, and it has fesvr in its
>> source tree, hence, there's no separate fesvr any more. The patch will
>> still be needed to get rid of the separate fesvr build for this recent
>> Spike revision.
>
>
> If you are bumping to a version which doesn't need my patch, great!
>
Yes, that's the point of the patch along with removing fesvr build.

> Is this all pushed now?
>
Not yet, waiting for approval.

>>
>> > Chris
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel at rtems.org
>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel